DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
“BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1901
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NR0O3184-14
20 June 2014
This is in reference to your recent Application for Correction
of Naval Record (DD Form 149).
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 18 June 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
yegulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC} memo
1400/3 MMPR-2 of 1 May 2014, a copy of which was previously
provided to you on 16 May 2014, and which is now enclosed. You
had the opportunity to respond within 30 days, but failed to do
sO.
Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the
‘entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
4
Sincerely,
ROBERT D. Z2SALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR865 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board: Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6114 13
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 390 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6870 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1660 RCT of 6 May 2014, a COpy of which was previously provided to you on 27 May 2014, and which is now enclosed. ra correction of an official Consequently, when applying fo naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6869 14
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1600 RcT of 5 May 2014, a copy of which was previously provided to you on 27 May 2014 and again on 5 June 2014 to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0080 14
COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NROOO8O-14 7 July 2014 in reference to your recent Application for Correction A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0215 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) 5420 Ser 91/026 of 5 Mar 2014, a Copy of which was provided to you on i May 2014, and which is now enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NROO215-14 official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1266 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 2 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NRO1266-14 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1747 14
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to. The Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 of 16 May 2014, a copy of which was previously provided to you and which is now enclosed. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8235 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, . Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3788 13
a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.